When the Recipe Fits the Baby: Personalizing Breast-Milk Fortification for Premature Infants

A long-term look at children from a personalized-fortification study (Quan et al., Frontiers in Nutrition 2026)

A study from a hospital in Beijing followed premature babies who were fed breast milk with extra nutrients added in one of two ways: a fixed "one-size" recipe, or a personalized recipe tailored to each baby. In the early months, the personalized group grew better—bigger head size, better weight, and higher iron levels—with no added side effects. But by the time the children were 6 to 10 years old, the two groups looked the same in growth, metabolism, lung function, and thinking skills. Personalizing early nutrition helped babies get a healthy start, safely.

Why This Question Matters

Breast milk is the best food for a premature baby, but on its own it does not contain enough protein, calories, and minerals to help a tiny infant grow the way they would have inside the womb. For that reason, doctors routinely "fortify" breast milk—adding a nutrient powder—for babies born very early [1]. The problem is that every mother's milk is different, and it changes over the weeks of feeding. When a hospital adds the exact same amount of fortifier to everyone's milk, some babies get more than they need and others get less. Even with fortification, many premature babies still fall behind on growth, and large modern studies show that growth failure and other complications remain common in the most premature infants [2]. Experts who reviewed the guidelines agree that fortifying is necessary but disagree about the best way to personalize it [3].

How Families Used to Face This

For years, the standard approach was the fixed recipe: a set number of packets of fortifier per bottle, the same for every baby. It was simple, but it ignored the natural variation in breast milk and in how each baby handles nutrition. Researchers tried to do better in two ways. One method measures the actual protein, fat, and sugar in each mother's milk and tops it up to a target—an approach that improved growth in a carefully designed trial where neither families nor staff knew which recipe each baby received [4]. The other method watches a simple blood test (blood urea nitrogen, a marker of whether a baby is getting enough protein) and nudges the fortifier dose up or down. The hospital in this study, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, built a five-step personalized plan using the baby's weight, the milk's protein content, and that blood test. Their earlier trial had already shown that personalized babies gained weight faster in the first weeks of life [5]. What no one yet knew was whether that head start still mattered years later—the question this new follow-up tried to answer [6].

What the Researchers Did

The team went back to the same group of babies from their original study—infants born before 34 weeks of pregnancy, weighing between 800 and 1,800 grams, and fed mostly breast milk [6]. They tracked each child's growth (weight, length, and head size) and iron levels through the first two years, using standard growth charts to compare each child fairly against others the same age [7]. Then, in 2023, they invited the children—now between 6 and 10 years old—back to the clinic for a check-up that included height and weight, blood tests for cholesterol, blood sugar, iron, and vitamin D, a breathing test, a bone-age X-ray, and a standard IQ test. Fifty-one children were followed through age two, and 25 of them came back for the school-age visit.

What They Found

In the early months, personalizing the recipe clearly helped. At 6 months, babies in the personalized group had larger head sizes—a sign that tracks with brain growth. By 2 years, they weighed more, and at 1 year they had higher hemoglobin, meaning healthier iron levels and less risk of anemia [8]. Just as importantly, the personalized recipe did not cause more feeding problems or other side effects, which reassures doctors who might otherwise worry about giving extra nutrition to such small babies.

By school age, though, the two groups had evened out. There were no meaningful differences in height, weight, body-mass index, bone age, vitamin D, cholesterol, blood sugar, or lung function, and neither group showed signs of metabolic problems. The IQ scores were slightly higher in the personalized group but not enough to count as a real difference. In other words, the early advantages were real, but they did not translate into measurable differences years later.

It helps to picture what "personalized" actually means here. Instead of one recipe for every baby, the doctors sorted each infant into one of five nutrition levels based on three simple things: how much the baby weighed, how much protein was in that mother's own milk, and a routine blood test that tells whether the baby is getting enough protein. A baby who needed more got extra fortifier, and sometimes a little added protein powder; a bigger, well-nourished baby got less. The idea is the same one a good tailor uses—measure first, then fit the garment to the person, rather than handing everyone the same size off the rack. What this study shows is that the tailored approach helped the babies who needed it most in the early months, when growth matters enormously and catching up is hardest, and that it did so without causing tummy troubles or other problems.

Parents sometimes ask whether faster early growth could be a bad thing—whether "fattening up" a premature baby quickly might store up trouble later. This study is one small piece of reassurance that it did not: years later, the personalized children were not heavier, did not have higher cholesterol or blood sugar, and showed no signs of metabolic disease.

What This Means for Your Baby

If your baby was born prematurely, the encouraging news is that personalizing the way breast milk is fortified is safe and can help your baby grow better and build healthier iron stores during the fragile early months. Those are exactly the things parents and doctors watch most closely after a NICU stay. Tailoring the recipe to your baby—rather than using a fixed dose for everyone—is a sensible, gentle way to help close the nutrition gap that prematurity creates [6].

It is also worth understanding why the differences faded over time. One common worry is that "catch-up" growth pushed too fast could raise the risk of weight or metabolism problems later in childhood [9]—a fair concern, since being born early already carries some long-term health risks [10]. This study is reassuring on that point: the personalized group showed no sign of higher cholesterol, blood sugar, or body weight at school age. And the fact that the two groups scored similarly on the IQ test does not mean early nutrition is unimportant. It means that once a child goes home, many other things—the home environment, reading and play, schooling, and family support—shape how they learn and grow, and these can matter even more than the exact feeding recipe in the hospital [11]. Careful check-ups after discharge remain one of the most valuable things families and doctors can do together [12].

What Researchers Are Working On Next

The main limitation of this study is its size: only 25 children returned for the school-age visit, which is too few to detect small but real differences with confidence. Some effects, such as those on the lungs, might also only show up later than the ages studied here [13]. Larger studies across multiple hospitals, following children for longer and measuring body composition in detail, are needed to learn which babies benefit most from personalized fortification—likely the smallest and most growth-restricted. Other research already hints that personalizing fortification improves both growth and body composition in very premature infants [14]. For now, the takeaway for families is warm and practical: personalizing your premature baby's nutrition is a safe way to support a strong early start, and it works best as one part of a caring plan that continues well beyond the hospital doors. If your baby was fed this way, you can take comfort in knowing it likely helped their growth in those crucial first months; and if they were not, the good news is that loving care, steady follow-up, and a supportive home matter just as much for how children thrive over the long run.

References

  1. Talebiyan S, Belfort MB. Human milk fortification for very preterm infants: toward optimal nutrient delivery, neonatal intensive care unit growth, and long-term outcomes. Clin Perinatol. 2023;50(3):625–41. doi:10.1016/j.clp.2023.04.001 ↩
  2. Bell EF, Hintz SR, Hansen NI, Bann CM, Wyckoff MH, DeMauro SB, et al. In-hospital morbidity, care practices, and 2-year outcomes for extremely preterm infants in the US, 2013–2018. JAMA. 2022;327(3):248–63. doi:10.1001/jama.2021.23580 ↩
  3. Meiliana M, Alexander T, Bloomfield FH, Cormack BE, Harding JE, Walsh O, et al. Nutrition guidelines for preterm infants: a systematic review. J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2024;48(1):11–26. doi:10.1002/jpen.2568 ↩
  4. Rochow N, Fusch G, Ali A, Bhatia A, So HY, Iskander R, et al. Individualized target fortification of breast milk with protein, carbohydrates, and fat for preterm infants: a double-blind randomized controlled trial. Clin Nutr. 2021;40(1):54–63. doi:10.1016/j.clnu.2020.04.031 ↩
  5. Quan M, Wang D, Gou L, Sun Z, Ma J, Zhang L, et al. Individualized human milk fortification to improve the growth of hospitalized preterm infants. Nutr Clin Pract. 2020;35(4):680–8. doi:10.1002/ncp.10366 ↩
  6. Quan M, Zhang Y, Zhang L, Wang C, Li Z. Long-term follow-up of a randomized controlled trial on individualized fortification of human milk. Front Nutr. 2026;12:1669809. doi:10.3389/fnut.2025.1669809 ↩
  7. Fenton TR, Kim JH. A systematic review and meta-analysis to revise the Fenton growth chart for preterm infants. BMC Pediatr. 2013;13:59. doi:10.1186/1471-2431-13-59 ↩
  8. Azhar M, Yasin R, Hanif S, Bughio SA, Das JK, Bhutta ZA. Nutritional management of low birth weight and preterm infants in low- and low middle-income countries. Neonatology. 2025;122(1):1–15. doi:10.1159/000542154 ↩
  9. Toftlund LH, Halken S, Agertoft L, Zachariassen G. Early nutrition and signs of metabolic syndrome at 6 y of age in children born very preterm. Am J Clin Nutr. 2018;107(5):717–24. doi:10.1093/ajcn/nqy015 ↩
  10. de Mendonça ELSS, de Lima Macêna M, Bueno NB, de Oliveira ACM, Mello CS. Premature birth, low birth weight, small for gestational age and chronic non-communicable diseases in adult life: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Early Hum Dev. 2020;149:105154. doi:10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105154 ↩
  11. Ruys CA, Bröring T, van Schie PEM, van de Lagemaat M, Rotteveel J, Finken MJJ, et al. Neurodevelopment of children born very preterm and/or with a very low birth weight: 8-year follow-up of a nutritional RCT. Clin Nutr ESPEN. 2019;30:190–8. doi:10.1016/j.clnesp.2018.12.083 ↩
  12. Cordova EG, Belfort MB. Updates on assessment and monitoring of the postnatal growth of preterm infants. NeoReviews. 2020;21(2):e98–e108. doi:10.1542/neo.21-2-e98 ↩
  13. Merino-Hernández A, Muñoz-Cutillas A, Ramos-Navarro C, Bellón-Alonso S, Rodríguez-Cimadevilla JL, González-Pacheco N, et al. Long-term lung function follow-up of preterm infants less than 32 weeks of gestational age. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2024;59(11):2922–31. doi:10.1002/ppul.27158 ↩
  14. Cardoso M, Virella D, Papoila AL, Alves M, Macedo I, e Silva D, et al. Individualized fortification based on measured macronutrient content of human milk improves growth and body composition in infants born less than 33 weeks: a mixed-cohort study. Nutrients. 2023;15(6):1533. doi:10.3390/nu15061533 ↩